(JNS) — “Why not?”

Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank asked that simple question last week after the normally publicity-mad Council on American-Islamic Relations told him it had nothing to say about a Boston BDS organization’s promotion of a “mapping project” that has been condemned as antisemitic and possible incitement to violence.

The interactive map posted online earlier this month “mapped” the addresses of dozens of Jewish institutions and organizations in Massachusetts. Its stated goal was “to reveal the local entities and networks that enact devastation, so we can dismantle them. Every entity has an address, every network can be disrupted.”

As antisemitic violence surges in the United States and across the world, a public call to disrupt Jewish groups and their allies understandably set off alarm bells.

Milbank called it “outright antisemitic bigotry … and implicit invitations to violence.” It is, he said, “the latest manifestation of an antisemitic canard alleging secret, hidden Jewish control of, and the buying of influence over, academia, the media, corporations, charities, law enforcement and more.”

BDS representatives didn’t respond to Milbank’s requests for comment. CAIR told him the map “is not an issue we’re dealing with at this time,” which certainly begs the question.

“Why not?” Milbank asked of CAIR’s refusal to comment. If you even casually follow CAIR, you know why not: CAIR leaders share the BDS movement’s opposition to Israel’s existence, often in terms that are very consistent.

CAIR-San Francisco Executive Director Zahra Billoo didn’t publish a map, but she told an American Muslims for Palestine conference last November that Jewish organizations from the Anti-Defamation League to synagogues to campus Hillels “are your enemies” if they support Israel. “There are organizations and infrastructures out there who are working to harm you.”

CAIR not only did nothing to disavow Billoo’s comments, it lashed out at critics for what it called an “online smear campaign.” It claimed the uproar was the result of “false allegations of anti-Semitism in a cynical attempt to silence American Muslims who speak up for Palestinian human rights.”

It shouldn’t need to be said, but calling Jews enemies who are out to hurt Muslims is not speaking up for Palestinian rights. It is sowing hate.

At the same event, CAIR co-founder and Executive Director Nihad Awad called Tel Aviv “occupied,” implying that all of Israel is illegitimate and built on “occupied” territory. He prayed that Tel Aviv “will be free later.”

Why not condemn an antisemitic BDS map? Could it be because of Awad and fellow CAIR co-founder Omar Ahmad’s membership in the Palestine Committee? The committee was a Muslim Brotherhood-created Hamas-support network in America that operated during the 1990s and early 2000s. Hamas rejects any peaceful settlement with Israel and vows to fight until the Jewish state is destroyed.

This isn’t some far-fetched conspiracy theory. It is proven by internal committee records seized by the FBI and admitted into evidence in open court. See for yourself via this Palestine Committee telephone list. Ahmad is listed under a pseudonym as “Omar Yehya.” He “was a leader within the Palestine Committee,” FBI Special Agent Lara Burns testified in 2008. And CAIR is included on a 1994 Palestine Committee agenda dated weeks after CAIR’s self-declared birthdate.

CAIR, prosecutors wrote, was “a participant in an ongoing and ultimately unlawful conspiracy to support a designated terrorist organization, a conspiracy from which CAIR never withdrew.”

Milbank wouldn’t know any of these facts if he searched the Post’s archives, because it has never reported them.

Given CAIR’s high profile and Capitol Hill headquarters, Post readers should be informed about some of the organization’s questionable internal issues. Yet the newspaper failed to report the growing number of CAIR employees, past and present, who allege sexual harassment, sexual discrimination and other malfeasances within the organization.

CAIR sued one whistleblower for defamation, but abruptly moved to dismiss before discovery began, perhaps because discovery could expose some of those complaints, along with information about CAIR’s foreign funding sources.

Perhaps Milbank’s column can serve as the beginning of a more clear-eyed look at CAIR in the mainstream media. Indeed, it is difficult to think of another organization that has received such consistently uncritical coverage despite a deep, documented history of wrongdoing.

In December, we at the Investigative Project on Terrorism listed examples of antisemitic rhetoric from CAIR officials dating back to the organization’s beginnings.

“Look at their names,” Awad said during a 1998 speech at Georgetown University, insinuating that Jews in the Clinton administration were “pushing the United States to go to war on behalf of a third party.” A decade later, Awad said that U.S. policy toward Israel comes “at the expense of American interests.” In 2014, as ISIS established a caliphate and Hamas terrorism instigated war in Gaza, Awad called Israel “the biggest threat to world peace and security.”

Awad posted a statement from the Palestinian BDS National Committee late Wednesday afternoon. It said the BDS movement “has no connection to and does not endorse the Mapping Project in Boston, Massachusetts.” CAIR did not post the statement, even though the statement does not condemn the map itself or its antisemitic nature. Instead, it continues the pattern of attacking people for noticing anti-Semitism.

“We reject and condemn the cynical use of this project as a pretext for repressive attacks on the Palestine solidarity movement by anti-Palestinian racists and apologists for Israeli apartheid, especially AIPAC and the ADL,” the statement said. “Their smears and intimidation are clear attempts to shut down freedom of expression, including the right to boycott, in support of the growing consensus that Israel today, like South Africa in the past, is an apartheid state.”

That’s strikingly similar to what CAIR said in defending Billoo. As noted above, CAIR dismissed criticism of Billoo as coming from “the Islamophobic, anti-Palestinian groups that use false allegations of antisemitism in a cynical attempt to silence American Muslims who speak up for Palestinian human rights.”

Got that? The real haters are the people who recognize and challenge hate.

Given this mindset, of course CAIR told Milbank that the BDS map “is not an issue we’re dealing with at this time.” CAIR believes the map is a righteous act.

Steven Emerson is executive director of the Investigative Project on Terrorism, the author of eight books on national security and terrorism, the producer of two documentaries and the author of hundreds of articles in national and international publications.